Files
group_fqcd_jr/tests/unit/service/test_risk_judgement_rw007.py
T

118 lines
4.1 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

"""RW-007 研判必须复核第十五条豁免额度(`docs/25` 第七节 #2)。
政策原文(`knowledge/policy/个人投资者适当性管理指南.md:334-341`):
- C3 买 R4:签署《产品风险超越投资者风险承受能力揭示书》后**可买**,但单只 R4 持仓
不超过总资产 **20%**;
- C4 买 R5:同理,上限 **10%**。
也就是说越级购买本身不是违规,**超出额度**才是。原先 `_assess_rw007` 只看留痕:
只要揭示书、二次确认、录音都齐,就判"疑似误报" —— 而这三样恰恰是豁免的**前提条件**,
把前提当成结论,于是"签了字但买超了额度"被静默放过。
数据缺失的情况单独处理:额度要靠总资产与持仓快照才能核算,本项目的画像与持仓由上游
流程写入(实测 `total_asset` 全为 0、`fin_holding` 为空),既不能默认"没超"判误报,
也不能默认"超了"判风险 —— 那会把豁免规则变成新的误报源。
"""
from typing import Any
from app.service.risk_judgement_service import (
VERDICT_CONTINUE_REVIEW,
VERDICT_RISK_SUPPORTED,
VERDICT_SUSPECTED_FALSE_POSITIVE,
_assess_rw007,
)
COMPLETE_WORK_ORDER: dict[str, Any] = {
"risk_disclosure_ack_at": "2026-09-01T00:00:00",
"second_confirmation_at": "2026-09-01T00:00:00",
"recording_reference": "REC-1",
}
REQUIRING_PRODUCT: dict[str, Any] = {
"risk_level": "R4",
"risk_disclosure_required": True,
"second_confirmation_required": True,
"recording_required": True,
}
def _detail(
snapshot: dict[str, Any],
*,
work_order: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
investor_type: str = "C3",
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""一条 C3→R4(相差 1 级、属豁免情形)的 RW-007 详情。"""
return {
"customer": {"investor_type": investor_type},
"product": dict(REQUIRING_PRODUCT),
"work_order": dict(COMPLETE_WORK_ORDER if work_order is None else work_order),
"evidence_snapshot": snapshot,
}
def test_limit_breach_is_risk_supported_even_with_complete_trace() -> None:
"""这是本次补上的判断:留痕齐全 ≠ 豁免成立,额度超了就是违规。"""
result = _assess_rw007(
_detail({"exemption_limit": "0.20", "exemption_ratio": "0.35"})
)
assert VERDICT_RISK_SUPPORTED in str(result)
assert "35.00%" in str(result)
assert "20%" in str(result)
def test_within_limit_with_complete_trace_is_a_false_positive() -> None:
result = _assess_rw007(
_detail({"exemption_limit": "0.20", "exemption_ratio": "0.10"})
)
assert VERDICT_SUSPECTED_FALSE_POSITIVE in str(result)
def test_exact_limit_is_not_a_breach() -> None:
"""政策写的是"不超过",恰好等于上限属于合规。"""
result = _assess_rw007(
_detail({"exemption_limit": "0.20", "exemption_ratio": "0.2"})
)
assert VERDICT_SUSPECTED_FALSE_POSITIVE in str(result)
def test_missing_snapshot_data_asks_for_manual_review() -> None:
"""额度核算不出结果时,既不判误报也不判风险。"""
result = _assess_rw007(
_detail(
{
"exemption_limit": "0.20",
"exemption_ratio": None,
"exemption_data_missing": True,
}
)
)
assert VERDICT_CONTINUE_REVIEW in str(result)
assert "总资产" in str(result)
def test_missing_trace_still_outranks_the_exemption_path() -> None:
"""留痕不完整仍然直接判风险 —— 豁免的**前提**没满足,谈额度没有意义。"""
result = _assess_rw007(
_detail(
{"exemption_limit": "0.20", "exemption_ratio": "0.01"},
work_order={},
)
)
assert VERDICT_RISK_SUPPORTED in str(result)
assert "缺少交易留痕" in str(result)
def test_pairs_outside_the_exemption_table_keep_the_old_behaviour() -> None:
"""C2→R5 不属豁免情形,快照里也不会有额度字段:行为必须与改动前一致。"""
result = _assess_rw007(_detail({}, investor_type="C2"))
assert VERDICT_SUSPECTED_FALSE_POSITIVE in str(result)