fix(memory-projection): 订正 outbox 取值口径并接通画像投影链路

背景:memory_sync_outbox 这条链此前**完全没有消费者**,且生产端照 docs/00 §6.4.6
写成大写 MILVUS/NEO4J + 中文「待处理」,而消费端按 target_store 的**值**分派 handler、
且只领 status in {pending, failed} —— 两个条件都不满足,事件任何消费者都领不到、
永久滞留且不报错(唯一键 (event_uuid, target_store) 对大小写无约束,MySQL 也不报错)。
根因是代码与测试都硬编码字面量,所以测试跟着一起错、谁也没拦住。

订正
- profile_generation_service:取值改为全仓一致的小写(milvus/neo4j/upsert/pending)
- 测试改为引用常量并断言消费端契约,不再硬编码(硬编码是本次跑偏的直接原因)
- 新增契约回归测试:断言大写值分派不到 handler、会进死信,谁改回大写立刻红
- 新增 tools/normalize_memory_sync_outbox.py:订正历史脏行(默认 dry-run、幂等)

接通投影链路(此前零消费者)
- 新增 Milvus 集合 user_long_term_memory_v1 及建集合工具(幂等、不覆盖已有集合)
- 新增 MilvusProfileProjection / MilvusProfileVectorClient,并修掉移植带来的两处必炸点:
  customer_id 由「必须 int」放宽为接受数字字符串(本仓所有生产者都写 str,
  不放宽则每个事件必然失败);不可投影的 memory_key 由「整批 raise」改为跳过留痕
  (否则一条 constraint: 记忆毒死该客户整批,而受控词表 13 个键里有 7 个不满足前缀)
- 新增 MemorySyncOutboxWorker(领取/指数退避/死信骨架保留原样)并接入 WorkerRuntime
- milvus → 向量投影;neo4j → 复用主干 ProfileGraphProjectionService(方案 A,
  不引入第二套投影,避免同一事实在图中两种说法、违反主干既有的只投影已确认事实的不变式)
- 生产端从 memory_unit(status=active) 组装 memory_sources,随事件带上确定快照
- 前置移植 conversation_privacy:写外部存储前脱敏手机号/证件号/银行卡等

验证
- 新增 17 个单测;全量 2 failed, 1307 passed, 2 skipped
  (2 个失败为既有环境项:断言请求体中文原文而 httpx 序列化成 \uXXXX,非本次引入)
- mypy app → 0 错(227 文件);audit_schema → 89 张业务表无缺失/意外,未改动表结构
- 真机:真实 embedding(1024 维) + 真实 Milvus 写入并回读通过
- 整合链路(测试记忆 → 生产端组装 → outbox → 消费端投递 → Milvus 回读)通过,
  且 MySQL 已回滚、Milvus 无残留

文档
- 新增 docs/32-记忆投影链路实现说明.md:真实口径、根因、契约与验证证据(供接手)
- AGENTS.md:新增该易错点;新增 Windows 中文输出乱码的正确命令(-X utf8);
  校正测试基线与 mypy 文件数

未做:未改 docs/00 基线、未动数据库迁移、未改投顾线代码、未启动常驻 Worker。
遗留:投顾线两处生产者的 payload 缺 memory_sources,会被消费至死信,待架构师确认是否投影。
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-12 10:45:40 +08:00
parent c82e9890e4
commit 8a0cbab636
15 changed files with 1477 additions and 12 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
"""`MemorySyncOutboxWorker` 的定向测试。
4 个用例移植自同事 `ZSY_develop` 的
`tests/unit/worker/test_memory_sync_outbox_worker.py`;最后一个用例是本仓新增的
**契约回归测试**——它是这次整条链故障的根因所在,必须有人守着。
"""
from datetime import datetime
import pytest
from app.model.memory import MemorySyncOutbox
from app.worker.memory_sync_outbox_worker import MemorySyncOutboxWorker
class FakeSession:
def __init__(self, event: MemorySyncOutbox | None) -> None:
self.event = event
self.commits = 0
self.rollbacks = 0
async def __aenter__(self) -> "FakeSession":
return self
async def __aexit__(self, *args: object) -> None:
return None
async def scalar(self, statement: object) -> MemorySyncOutbox | None:
del statement
return self.event
async def commit(self) -> None:
self.commits += 1
async def rollback(self) -> None:
self.rollbacks += 1
def event(*, target: str = "neo4j", retry_count: int = 0) -> MemorySyncOutbox:
return MemorySyncOutbox(
id=1, event_uuid="event-1", aggregate_type="profile",
aggregate_uuid="profile-1", aggregate_version=1, target_store=target,
operation="upsert", payload={"customer_id": 7}, status="pending",
retry_count=retry_count, next_retry_at=None, last_error=None,
created_at=datetime(2026, 1, 1), processed_at=None,
)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_success_marks_event_processed() -> None:
item = event()
session = FakeSession(item)
seen: list[dict[str, object]] = []
async def handler(payload: dict[str, object]) -> None:
seen.append(payload)
worker = MemorySyncOutboxWorker({"neo4j": handler}, session_factory=lambda: session)
assert await worker.run_once() is True
assert seen == [{"customer_id": 7}]
assert item.status == "processed"
assert item.processed_at is not None
assert session.commits == 1
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_handler_failure_uses_backoff_and_keeps_event() -> None:
item = event()
session = FakeSession(item)
async def handler(payload: dict[str, object]) -> None:
del payload
raise TimeoutError
worker = MemorySyncOutboxWorker({"neo4j": handler}, session_factory=lambda: session)
assert await worker.run_once() is True
assert item.status == "failed"
assert item.retry_count == 1
assert item.next_retry_at is not None
assert item.last_error == "TimeoutError"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fifth_failure_enters_dead_state() -> None:
item = event(retry_count=4)
session = FakeSession(item)
async def handler(payload: dict[str, object]) -> None:
del payload
raise RuntimeError
worker = MemorySyncOutboxWorker({"neo4j": handler}, session_factory=lambda: session)
await worker.run_once()
assert item.status == "dead"
assert item.retry_count == 5
assert item.next_retry_at is None
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_missing_handler_enters_dead_state_without_external_call() -> None:
item = event(target="milvus")
session = FakeSession(item)
worker = MemorySyncOutboxWorker({"neo4j": lambda _: None}, session_factory=lambda: session)
assert await worker.run_once() is True
assert item.status == "dead"
assert item.last_error == "target_handler_not_configured"
# --- 本仓新增:契约回归 ------------------------------------------------------
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_no_handler_is_registered_for_uppercase_target_store() -> None:
"""契约回归:`target_store` 只能是小写 `milvus`/`neo4j`。
背景(这条链真实故障的根因):`profile_generation_service` 曾照 `docs/00` §6.4.6
写作大写 `MILVUS`/`NEO4J` + 中文状态 `待处理`,而本 worker 按 `target_store` 的**值**
分派 handler、且只领 `{"pending","failed"}`。结果该事件两个条件都不满足,
**任何消费者都领不到,永久滞留且不报错**(唯一键 `(event_uuid, target_store)`
对大小写没有约束,所以静默)。
本用例把"大写分派不到"这一事实钉住:将来谁把取值改回大写,这里会立刻红。
"""
item = event(target="MILVUS", retry_count=0)
session = FakeSession(item)
called: list[object] = []
async def handler(payload: dict[str, object]) -> None:
called.append(payload)
worker = MemorySyncOutboxWorker({"milvus": handler}, session_factory=lambda: session)
assert await worker.run_once() is True
assert called == [] # 大写键分派不到 milvus handler
assert item.status == "dead"
assert item.last_error == "target_handler_not_configured"