Files
group_fqcd_jr/app/worker/risk_scan_scheduler.py
T
张胜宇 5d0becb67d 客服 Agent 重构收口:五出口决策链 + 知识库档位隔离 + 前端入参边界(答辩演示版本)
一、客服 Agent 智能增强(正面回应"不智能、动不动就转人工")
- 决策链由 2 个出口扩到 5 个:E1 澄清 / E2 计算型 / E3 知识直返 / E4 证据约束生成 / E5 分级回退
- 转人工从"默认动作"降为最后一档 E5c,只保留 4 类白名单:
  P0 反诈 / P1 账户与个人数据 / P2 写操作与争议 / 用户明确要求人工
- 46 条金标实测(修复前 → 修复后):
  转人工率 43.5% → 10.9%;出口准确率 45.7% → 100%;事实正确率 69.6% → 100%
  禁忌违反 1 → 0;档位越权 / 无出处数字 / 误拒 四项零容忍全 0
- 安全不变量 INV-1~INV-5;零容忍规则未删,改的是挂载点
  (输出侧字面黑名单 → 检索层档位隔离 + 判定层合规词表 + 输出守护)

二、知识库:档位单点化与物理隔离
- 新增 app/core/knowledge_tier.py 作为档位规则唯一落点(G-03),
  knowledge_contracts.py 原定义块改为显式再导出(X as X,非副本)
- 档位过滤由 bool 默认值(fail-open)改为 tiers 必填集合(缺参即 TypeError)
- Milvus 侧四集合按 visibility 分区键物理隔离;双 schema 收敛为一套
- 新增 app/core/actor.py:访客三元组与匿名判定的唯一构造/判定点(G-01/G-01b)
- 新增 app/core/fund_fee_rules.py:费率计算纯函数

三、前端入参边界对齐(本轮 W11 新修,4 处"校验宽于存储")
- message 加 max_length=8000(与浮窗 widget.js 的 maxlength 一致)
- session_id 加 1—64;idempotency_key 上限 128 → 64(对齐列宽 String(64))
- feedback_type 加 max_length=32(对齐列宽 String(32))
- 8 条路径参数补 min_length=1 + max_length=64 + 字符集正则
  ({session_id} / {run_id} / {handover_id})
- 改前超限值会落到 MySQL 才失败(500);改后一律 422 AGENT_INPUT_INVALID + 字段级定位
- 新增 tests/unit/api/test_frontend_boundaries.py(33 例),含"端点表 ↔ OpenAPI 全量对照"

四、投顾模块整体清除(D4.4 / D4.5)
- 删除投顾相关 controller / schema / model / repository / service 及门户页面
- tools/portal_api_check.py 同步作废 AD003/AD005/AD011/A047 四条用例与 advisor_t 登录
  (端点与账号均已不存在,此前稳定报 3 条假红)

五、验证(提交前实测)
- pytest -q:1856 passed / 2 skipped / 0 failed
- ruff check app tools tests:19(= 基线);mypy app:2(= 基线)
- 前端接口契约体检 portal_api_check.py:38 项,通过 34,失败 0,跳过 4
- 全链路冒烟 e2e_smoke_test.py --read-only:31/31
- HTTP 全链路探针 http_probe.py:11/11 succeeded
- 跨文档一致性 _consistency.py:GATE PASS
- 真机边界复验 12 条:12/12 符合预期

六、纪律与文档
- 可改文件白名单 A-09(docs/46)与底座会签申请单 A-10(docs/47,组 1—组 4 全部受理)
- 零 DDL:未新增/修改任何表结构,89 张业务表与基线一致
- 证据留痕:docs/evidence/**(含 46 条金标 score、快照、清除与重建记录)
- 未提交(刻意排除,见提交说明):仓库内 客服agent/ 与 开发文档/ 是 2026-09-16 前的
  过期副本(Todolist 440 行 vs 权威 D2.1 1167 行),权威正本在仓库外;
  _chunks_report.txt 是 tools/build_knowledge_chunks.py 生成的本地产物
2026-09-20 14:33:30 +08:00

186 lines
6.8 KiB
Python

"""风控规则扫描定时 Worker。
该进程不依赖 Web 进程生命周期,通过 MySQL 咨询锁保证同一时刻只有一个
调度者执行扫描。默认关闭,配置开启后才执行。
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import asyncio
import logging
from collections.abc import Awaitable, Callable
from contextlib import AbstractAsyncContextManager
from datetime import UTC, datetime, timedelta
from typing import Any
from uuid import uuid4
from app.core.config import get_settings
from app.core.contracts import RequestContext
from app.infrastructure.db import SessionFactory, engine, mysql_scan_lock
from app.model.audit import InteractionAudit
from app.service.risk_scan_schedule_config import (
RiskScanScheduleConfig,
load_risk_scan_schedule_config,
)
from app.service.risk_scan_service import RiskScanService
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
ConfigLoader = Callable[[], Awaitable[RiskScanScheduleConfig]]
ScanExecutor = Callable[[], Awaitable[dict[str, int | str]]]
AuditWriter = Callable[[str, dict[str, Any]], Awaitable[None]]
LockFactory = Callable[[], AbstractAsyncContextManager[bool]]
# 跨进程扫描锁已移到 `app/infrastructure/db.py`:端点与调度器**必须共用同一把锁**,
# 放在基础设施层两个入口才都能引用(service 不该反向依赖 worker)。
async def default_scan_executor() -> dict[str, int | str]:
context = RequestContext(
user_id="0",
trace_id=f"risk-scan-schedule-{uuid4()}",
roles=("system",),
permissions=("risk:alert:scan",),
data_scope="all",
portal="worker",
)
async with SessionFactory() as session:
return await RiskScanService.from_settings(session).scan(context)
async def default_audit_writer(status: str, detail: dict[str, Any]) -> None:
async with SessionFactory() as session, session.begin():
session.add(
InteractionAudit(
actor_type="system",
actor_id=None,
target_customer_id=None,
portal="worker",
action_type=f"risk_scan_scheduled_{status}",
detail=detail,
created_at=datetime.now(UTC).replace(tzinfo=None),
)
)
class RiskScanSchedulerWorker:
def __init__(
self,
*,
config_loader: ConfigLoader = load_risk_scan_schedule_config,
scan_executor: ScanExecutor = default_scan_executor,
audit_writer: AuditWriter = default_audit_writer,
lock_factory: LockFactory = mysql_scan_lock,
now: Callable[[], datetime] | None = None,
) -> None:
self.config_loader = config_loader
self.scan_executor = scan_executor
self.audit_writer = audit_writer
self.lock_factory = lock_factory
self.now = now or (lambda: datetime.now(UTC))
self.last_run_at: datetime | None = None
async def run_once(self, *, force: bool = False) -> bool:
config = await self.config_loader()
if not config.enabled:
return False
current = self.now()
if not force and not self._is_due(config, current):
return False
async with self.lock_factory() as acquired:
if not acquired:
logger.info("风控定时扫描由其他 Worker 执行,本轮跳过")
return False
return await self._execute_with_retry(config)
def _is_due(
self,
config: RiskScanScheduleConfig,
current: datetime,
) -> bool:
if self.last_run_at is None:
# 进程刚起来,不知道自己上次是什么时候跑的 —— `last_run_at` 只存在内存里。
# **保守地视为 due**:多跑一次的最坏后果是重复扫描,而扫描本身是幂等的
# (每条规则先 `_exists` 查重)并且有 MySQL 级锁;反过来"不跑"的后果可能是
# **永远不跑**:原先这里返回 `config.run_immediately`(默认 False),
# 重启之后 `_is_due` 恒为假,调度器形同虚设 —— 而且没有任何告警,
# 现场只会表现为"风控好像没在扫描"。
#
# `config.run_immediately` 因此不再承担"首次是否执行"的语义(它原本想表达的
# 是"启动后别马上跑",但那与"永远不跑"在实现上无法区分)。字段保留,
# 以免破坏既有配置。
return True
return current - self.last_run_at >= timedelta(minutes=config.interval_minutes)
async def _execute_with_retry(
self,
config: RiskScanScheduleConfig,
) -> bool:
attempts = config.retry_limit + 1
last_error: Exception | None = None
for attempt in range(1, attempts + 1):
try:
result = await self.scan_executor()
self.last_run_at = self.now()
await self.audit_writer(
"succeeded",
{
**result,
"attempt": attempt,
"trace_id": f"risk-scan-schedule-{uuid4()}",
},
)
return True
except Exception as error:
last_error = error
logger.warning(
"风控定时扫描失败 attempt=%s/%s",
attempt,
attempts,
exc_info=True,
)
await self.audit_writer(
"failed",
{
"attempts": attempts,
"error_type": type(last_error).__name__ if last_error else "unknown",
"trace_id": f"risk-scan-schedule-{uuid4()}",
},
)
return False
async def serve(*, once: bool = False, force: bool = False) -> None:
worker = RiskScanSchedulerWorker()
try:
while True:
try:
await worker.run_once(force=force)
except Exception:
logger.warning("风控定时扫描 Worker 轮次失败", exc_info=True)
if once:
raise
if once:
return
await asyncio.sleep(get_settings().risk_scan_poll_seconds)
finally:
await engine.dispose()
def main() -> None:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="南方基金风控规则定时扫描 Worker")
parser.add_argument("--once", action="store_true", help="执行一轮后退出")
parser.add_argument("--force", action="store_true", help="忽略间隔,立即执行一次")
args = parser.parse_args()
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
try:
asyncio.run(serve(once=args.once, force=args.force))
except KeyboardInterrupt:
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()